One of the most important factors that determine the success of your daily deal website is the size of your subscriber list. In fact, if you are not confident about building up your subscriber list rapidly to thousands of subscribers within weeks, you might as well not start a daily deal website. And building means building, not buying or transplanting.

There are two possible strategies to employ when building your subscriber list: organic and non-organic. Organic methods basically require the subscribers to actively type in their email addresses and click the subscribe button. Non-organic methods, otherwise known as spamming/cheating, basically involve spamming offers to people who never said that they even cared about daily deals, much less your fledgling daily deal website. If you are thinking about using non-organic methods, such as sending offers to your friends and family or buying a mailing list, just stop, unless you want to rapidly lose friends and money. It does not matter how big or promising your purchased mailing list is. You are a spammer. And no company has ever made spamming profitable. It will NEVER work. Or at least we have never seen it succeed, which says something, since we host more than 300 daily deal websites.

Now that we have gotten non-organic methods out of the way, here are some organic methods for your consideration:

1. Begin with a niche
It is surprising that many daily deal websites still dare to open shop and compete directly with Groupon or other big daily deal players. It is pointless – you will never win, nor will you even “barely survive.” The first step in getting visitors and prospective buyers to hand over their email addresses is to have a unique premise that captures their attention. There is a surplus of generic daily deal websites already; starting yet another is suicide. You need to differentiate your daily deal website in an increasingly-saturated industry by picking an underserved market segment: a geographical niche, a demographic niche, an industrial niche, etc. All things being equal, a generic daily deal website is much less likely to survive than, say, a daily deal website targeted at women selling health and beauty products.

2. Get impressions for your URL on the world wide web
People online are already too busy using Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, and 9GAG to even care about your new daily deal website launch. It is your job to go out there and make them aware of your new website. That means posting your URL on forums, blog comment sections, Facebook, Twitter, and discussion portals, like Reddit, according to your chosen niche in part 1. For instance, if you are starting a daily deal website for pets, post politely (and, as best as possible, be contextually relevant) on pet care blogs’ comment sections and pet care forums. Here is a workable plan: 1) google a list of blogs and forums dedicated to your niche and open the results in new tabs, 2) find a way to post your URL – register usernames if you have to – and do your sales pitch, and 3) keep doing it until you have posted 50 or 100 URLs for the day or whatever target you think is necessary to bring in traffic, even for the short term. And do track your traffic using Google Analytics. There is almost no other way around this. If you are hoping that your website spreads like wildfire through viral marketing or even pay-per-click marketing like Facebook Ads, fat chance!

3. Run lucky draws and free deals, amplified by Facebook and Twitter
People are already inundated with enough spam and unwanted emails to know better than to simply give out their email addresses. When you launch, people have exactly zero trust in your new daily deal website, which is why it is important to start small and start interesting with a lucky draw or free deal. People want to be enticed to care about your daily deal website. The bad news is that, either way, it is going to cost money. The good news is that spending money to entice people to give you their email addresses is probably more sensible and cheaper than simply spending money to entice people to come to your barren, boring website, e.g. via Google AdWords. Giving out one iPad in a lucky draw costs you a few hundred dollars and can probably net you 1,000 opt-in email addresses. Google AdWords and Facebook Ads? Never!

4. Great deals – sell them
Many players new to the daily deal industry expect visitors to give up their email addresses when your deal inventory is pitiful. Of course, selling to merchants is hard when you do not have a big subscriber list – it is a chicken-and-egg situation – but you have to do both simultaneously, because they are mutually-reinforcing. The more interesting deals you have, the more likely that you look like an established website and the more likely that people want to give up their email addresses. The more email addresses you have, the easier it is to work with merchants to sell their deals. Here is a tip: attack the merchant side of things first. Sell deals for merchants even for free at the start (if you need to) to get your hands on a great deal. By the way, if you need a guide on what makes a great deal great, here are some characteristics of a great deal.

5. Get a few large deal aggregators to promote deals for you
This method will cost money in that you will need to hand over an affiliate commission for referrals, but it is one of the best ways to reach a broad audience, gain instant credibility, and get not only new subscribers but also new buyers, without spending any upfront cash. Some examples include DealSurf and AllTheDeals. How do you convince an established deal aggregator to list your deals? Simple, by following parts 1 and 4 above.

Finally, half of knowing how to get subscribers is knowing how not to get subscribers. Non-organic ways should be avoided like the plague, just as a recap, but it is also important to avoid broader fatal mistakes that will indirectly hamper your ability to get subscribers and build your mailing list (here is a list). Good luck with your daily deal website!

Here is a plausible thought: it is possible to have a really great deal that is in demand and still have poor sales coming from it because of obstacles that exist along the way after your visitor has decided to purchase the deal, e.g. laborious checkout process, checkout surprises like large shipping costs (for shipped products), and, yes, ridiculous fine print – ridiculous in terms of quantity and nature. A good practice to adopt is to be a daily deal consumer yourself, especially for the goods and services that you already routinely pay full price for, and try to understand the mentality and behavior of daily deal consumers.

Consumers generally only start reading the fine print of a deal – which, needless to say, is a chore and a potentially-killjoy activity – when they have somewhat made up their mind to purchase the deal. If an item in the fine print is not essential, remove it. Expiry dates are common and understandable, but some of the most common party poopers are: 1) “weekdays only” or other time-limited terms, 2) minimum purchase required, 3) venue restrictions, 4) item restrictions (e.g. only applicable to certain menu items in restaurants), and 5) unreasonable “while stock lasts” restrictions. The more fine print a deal has, the less freedom and thus more stress the consumer has in using the voucher. In a way, it feels as if the merchant and the daily deal website are not sincere about welcoming new customers to try out their offering.

To instill some fine print discipline, daily deal websites can try sticking to some internal rules. For instance, a daily deal website owner can vow to only include a maximum of 5 fine print per deal or swear not to include a certain type of fine print (e.g. minimum purchase). No consumer likes fine print, and, to some extent, merchants do not necessarily reap a net benefit by having them. It may even serve as a competitive advantage; while your competitors are incorrigibly saddling their deals with an absurd, stress-inducing amount of fine print, you are making your deals easy to understand at a glance and also putting forth a sincere offer that is not ridden by terms that consumers may not notice before purchase.

Have we seen deals with a large amount of fine print do well across our network of hosted sites? Certainly. A low volume of fine print is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for a deal to sell well, but it definitely is a factor in favor of increasing sales. The general rule of how to sell things is 1) sell something people want and 2) make it easy for people to buy it. Of course, if you are not sure whether something has demand, do not bother about tweaking the fine print etc.; it will not help. Sometimes, however, your deal may be so wanted that your buyers would be willing to tolerate a certain amount of fine print beyond the ordinary – use your judgment to decide whether your particular segment of buyers would be bothered by the fine print vis-à-vis the uniqueness of your offer.

Here are some great resources that you can bookmark to learn about how the daily deal industry works along with tips and tricks for you to successfully run your own daily deal business. We ourselves frequently visit these resources to improve our knowledge of the industry. If you have not started a daily deal business and are strongly considering starting one, sign up for a free trial account on our website and use the following materials to support your learning:

http://www.quora.com/Deals-Daily-Group-Other

http://www.reddit.com/r/dailydeals

http://www.dailydealmedia.com/

http://ecommerce-news.internetretailer.com/nav/cat2/socialmedia/cat1/marketing/0

http://www.getelastic.com/

Bonus: http://blog.asmartbear.com/

Happy New Year in advance!

Daily deal sites are about discounts and the best offers, which in turn imply that they exist to bring to consumers the lowest prices and the biggest savings. Ergo, it may be intuitive that, to be the market leader in a niche, a daily deal business may need to undercut its competition with margin-suppressing price cuts. The problem with this mentality is not only that it almost always results in less revenue (one might find that economics principles do not always apply in real life; the buyers do not necessarily make it up in numbers) but also that the retail pricing of deals is never the sole decision of the daily deal business itself – the merchant has a substantial say (sometimes whole say) in the pricing details.

The fact is that the customer of any daily deal business is the merchant, not the end-consumer. The end-consumer is the customer of the merchant. The end-consumer basically acts as a supplier to the daily deal business, because they aid in the acquisition of merchants as customers. Revenue is collected first by the daily deal site, yes, but that revenue is in effect passed on in whole to the merchant, who then passes a cut to the daily deal business in the form of a commission.

Pricing in the business model of daily deal businesses thus refers to the commission percentage that the daily deal business is willing to work on. Dropping your commission percentage to unhealthy levels may seem like a good idea to undercut the competition, but consider the fact that daily deal sites may be Veblen goods: their perceived value drops with their pricing. When you drop your pricing, you not only give up revenue unnecessarily but also create a negative perception impact on your offering.

The obvious solution is to start at a higher pricing; aim to be a premium daily deal site servicing local merchants with a higher-than-average commission percentage. The only thing better than cheap is good. When no merchant buys at your ideal price point, do not make your offering cheaper; make it better. Provide a range of value-added services, such as faster payment timelines, customer retention strategies, super-strict lead qualification, generous collection and sharing of buyer data, etc. Merchants do not actually want to work with the cheapest daily deal site, which probably does not even bring in enough revenue to provide meaningful value – merchants simply want to work with daily deal sites that can do their job, and do their job well.

It is not a stretch to say that the existing daily deal sales model is broken. Consumers are expected to spend money upfront for a printable piece of voucher that is to be redeemed in some distant time in the future and that has no guarantee of validity or authenticity. This model places the onus on the buyer to remember to use the voucher according to all of its many terms, failing which it would create pure profit for either the merchant or the daily deal website in question (if the latter manages to negotiate with the former to transfer payments only on redemption). This situation seems advantageous at first glance for merchants and even daily deal websites (who act as a gatekeeper for all funds coming in) but less so for consumers who bear the risk of not using the vouchers according to their terms and thus having their payment forfeited.

Some consumers have arguably come to recognize that this situation is sub-optimal for their interests. The mother issue is actually that for most goods and services, consumers are used to paying on the spot and getting their goods or services at the same time – the window of risk is indeed much smaller. The daily deal sales model – pay now, get goods or services much later – is a stark departure from mainstream practice. Over time, it has become clear that many consumers are simply plagued by the following problems:

Problem 1: redemption in the future creates the risk that the voucher will be unused.
Solution: let consumers pay only a small initial payment online to minimize risk exposure. This initial payment should preferably be equal to the daily deal website’s share of revenue to minimize administrative work. This increases the probability of a sale happening because: 1) should the buyer fail to redeem the voucher by the due date, he loses only a small(er) amount of money, and 2) the smaller initial payment makes it much easier to stomach at first glance. Consumers are irrational, after all.

Problem 2: consumers are apprehensive of the prospect that the deal is bogus.
Solution: offer free vouchers. With rampant fraud in the daily deal industry perpetrated by irresponsible sellers (need we say more), consumers are finding it harder to trust daily deal websites. The solution is to simply provide free vouchers (meaning consumer pay nothing upfront and only pay the discounted price during redemption), and then either charge a flat monthly fee to merchants for promoting their goods and services or depend on the merchant for your share, much like authors depend on publishers for royalties. Free vouchers are increasingly popular, because they require no upfront investment on the part of the consumer; yet it still drives people through the doors of merchants. This model is also well-suited for markets where online payments are just not common.

Problem 3: consumers dislike having to print vouchers or expend additional effort to get the discount for which they have paid.
Solution: focus on SMS/mobile redemption. While mobile redemption is already a common practice in the industry, what needs to be done is phasing out the very idea of printable vouchers. Consumers should be able to redeem their deal just with a unique voucher code in hand (which can be delivered via mobile phones or email), much like how prepaid cards for cellular phones work. The whole printable voucher system seems to be a relic of imitating traditional coupon clippings that is truly an anomaly in the age of email and smart phones.

The truth is that pleasing the customer is the best long-term strategy to generate sustainable business (in our case, it would be pleasing our customers’ customers). When everybody’s interests are aligned, everybody wins. The current model is still disadvantageous to consumers, thus new sales models will eventually and inevitably emerge to rectify the imbalance, since, after all, consumers are the ultimate source of revenue in the daily deal industry.

Customer support and, in a broader view, customer service can be considered a “make or break” factor when deciding whether to patronize a brand or company; they are important. These days, however, good customer support is lauded and placed on the pedestal too much, ignoring the fact that the best customer support is actually customer support that is not needed. Most people just want to find out the information they want or do what they came to your website to do without having to contact anyone, no matter how quick, effective, or friendly the person on the other end is.

We run a young daily deal platform where the only way we can improve our product is to have constant feedback from our early customers so that we can build something that is wanted by the market. We thus treated customer support queries and customer feedback as reasons to be happy – people are interested in our product, people are engaged with our product, and, now that they have made first contact, we can even show them how quickly and effectively we solve problems for them! The truth is that having to contact anyone on anything is an absolute pain. Quick, effective customer support is simply the best apology that the vendor can offer – a weak compromise – for providing a product, service, website, ebook, game, etc. that basically does not do what it is supposed to do (hence the need to shoot off an email or make a phone call to the vendor).

There are really two broad strategies that a company can employ with regard to customer support: 1) accept that customer support is inevitable, a norm, part and parcel of running a business, and focus on offering the best customer service standards, and 2) treat customer support queries as anomalies or bug reports (preventative customer support), where preventive action ought to be taken by rectifying the “bugs” that precipitated the customer support queries in the first place. Of course, to say that customer support is an anomaly is far-fetched – big customer support departments exist even in the most successful companies out there, e.g. Google, PayPal, Amazon, etc. (though note Amazon’s actual stand on this issue – founder and CEO Jeff Bezos said that “[o]ur version of a perfect customer experience is one in which our customer doesn’t want to talk to us. Every time a customer contacts us, we see it as a defect. I’ve been saying for many, many years, people should talk to their friends, not their merchants. And so we use all of our customer service information to find the root cause of any customer contact.”) The best customer support strategy, in our view, is, unsurprisingly, a hybrid – cure the “bug” that precipitated the customer support query in the first place while being quick, effective, and friendly.

Some companies (deliberately) misinterpret the concept of preventative customer support by making it laborious and difficult for customers to contact them, with methods including hiding email addresses, forcing customers to use a customer support portal ticket system, making the abovementioned process long with many fields to fill up, etc., and then concluding that the lack of customer support queries means that the product is relatively faultless. This form of fake prevention will only cripple the company in question in the long run, because crucial learning points are blocked off and filtered out by an intimidating customer support process. The best way to know if the offering is good is to make it ridiculously easy for people to contact you and at the same time getting a very low number of customer support queries (“you guys are awesome” emails do not count). That way we know that people are not contacting you because there is no need to, not because it is a pain to do so.

Customer support is not a good thing, all in all. It is a glaring symptom of a poorly-made product. People are buying a product after all, and the overwhelming majority of people would choose a good product with poor customer support over a poor product with good customer support (because, really, a good product does not need customer support). Ultimately, customer support is a means to an end – it is a qualitative system for product testing and feedback that should be used to improve the product until, ideally, no one has any more bugs to report.

P.S. I made a distinction between customer support and customer service, because the former is the activity of providing help to a customer who asked for it, while the latter is really a spirit, a culture that is embedded in everything a company does (of which customer support is a small part). Needless to say, good customer service should always permeate throughout any organization that wants to succeed.

Groupon’s extraordinary growth as a daily deal website is truly enviable for any actual or potential competitor. In fact, it would be seriously tempting to copy any externally-observable tactic employed by Groupon to try to replicate just a fraction of its phenomenal success. Interestingly, one may even say that our daily deal platform, Zuupy CrowdDeals, exists solely to service hundreds of individuals and small businesses whose raison d’etre is to clone Groupon itself.

The truth is that Groupon can get away with a lot of things because of its deep pockets and humungous (read: 9-figure) subscriber list. It can afford to experiment and implement a number of different things, including having a gigantic sales force to hard-sell merchants, having less-than-attractive/tired website designs, producing over-enthusiastic copy, and actively running deals across a ridiculous number of cities. Groupon is like the Amazon of the daily deal industry – it might not necessarily be wise to copy their every move given how different their circumstances are.

Just as you would not run a minimart the way Walmart or Tesco runs their hypermart, you should not run your fledgling daily deal website the way the market leader runs it. You can certainly draw inspiration, but it has to be backed by sound justification – and the only sound justification is really your subscribers/customers saying that they want whatever you intend to copy. Copying blindly without any indication or evidence that the demand for whatever you are copying exists is a waste of time, money, and resources. Find out what your subscribers want by talking to them. When you are small, you probably cannot do things autonomously and get away with it (a la the way Facebook frequently changes its layout and breaches its privacy policy); you need to bend over to some extent to the miniscule number of people who miraculously even care about your daily deal website.

The truth is that all Groupon did was validate the business model (and even then, how validated the business model is remains to be seen given the infancy of the industry). Copying the business model itself may be prudent – after all, if it has demonstrated a clear path to profit, it would be not prudent not to copy it – but copying its design, branding, marketing, and even deal inventory may not be effective, because you have a different set of subscribers with different demographics who have different wants and needs. You probably do not control the eventual make-up of your subscriber list (assuming they are opt-in subscribers, which they better be), as much as your positioning hopes to achieve a certain demographic composition. Design, branding, and copywriting follow who your subscribers and customers are, not vice-versa.

If you are going to copy Groupon with no additional innovation whatsoever, you will not succeed, not even marginally – because Groupon will always be a better Groupon than you can hope to be. You need to be better in some aspects, be they pricing, customer service, value-added content, or niche targeting, in order for consumers to even consider patronizing your daily deal website. Would you rather buy from Groupon or BestSuperSavingsDailyDeals? I know that Groupon will be the safe choice, and, unless BestSuperSavingsDailyDeals can offer something Groupon does not have, I would be better off sticking to Groupon. So would millions of others.

Customer feedback is important to any business, more so to new businesses. With an emerging glut of daily deal websites, daily deal websites that bother finding out what they can do better will stand out and build better customer loyalty. It is more important to engage those who have actually paid you money than those who have simply showed interest in your daily deal website. Paying customers are people who have been through the full process of browsing, purchasing, and redeeming deals on your website and thus have more credibility.

While Facebook and Twitter may be appropriate channels for feedback acquisition, one-on-one feedback channels, such as email or even Skype, may be better ways to obtain candid, honest feedback. Certain daily deal websites may resort to half-hearted, pseudo-big corp methods of acquiring feedback, such as inflexible survey forms, but the better daily deal website owners know that human-to-human interaction always results in the most effective exchange of thoughts and ideas.

Some ways to follow up include offering a gift voucher (or even purchase credits) for a 15-minute chat on Skype and interacting with customers on the pretext of something else (customer support, holiday greetings, newsletter updates, etc.). Anyone who is willing to engage with your business is providing insights for strategic decision-making. However, an important skill to employ is to analyze feedback prudently (whether a given piece of feedback is peculiar or representative of other customers) and then formulate actionable plans to address said feedback. In our experience, anytime we hear a piece of feedback twice or more times, we treat it as representative of a segment of our customers.

It is safe to say that not many businesses bother to follow up with customers further down the sales funnel, partly because of complacency, i.e. they are already paying customers! It is too easy to just focus on getting new subscribers and buyers onboard without sufficiently tending to existing customers who have been providing revenue for your daily deal website. Sometimes the bottleneck of your daily deal business may be that the user experience is just sub-optimal – and only people who have been with you for a while and purchased your deals would be able to tell you why and how to improve.

The daily deal industry leader, Groupon (or at least its Chinese subsidiary), was recently accused of offering a fake McDonald’s deal, through which it sold more than 800 vouchers that McDonald’s said that it never agreed to fulfill. When even the biggest player in the space engages in fraudulent behavior, one has to wonder if consumers are beginning to distrust daily deal websites in general. After all, is there really a way to verify if the deal is real – and, if it is, is it worth it taking the risk that the voucher cannot or will not be used in the future (for whatever reason) by pre-paying for the voucher, sometimes several weeks in advance?

In real life, most goods and services are delivered on the spot, even if sold by agents or authorized representatives. To consumers unfamiliar with the daily deal model, the idea of pre-paying for a dubious-looking voucher that is to be stored in a smart phone or printed out for use during redemption in some future time at some third-party merchant may feel strange. Naturally, the higher the deal price, the greater the feeling of insecurity that it may be a fraud or that it may not be recognized by the merchant. How would consumers know if the merchant actually participated in that deal on said terms? There is no way to verify directly with the merchant.

It is by design that daily deal websites want to shield their visitors and buyers from the merchants. But daily deal website owners should also know that not all consumers have full confidence in newly-launched daily deal websites when deals more expensive than, say, US$50 are offered. There are fortunately some trust-building tactics that you can employ to increase conversions, in order of increasing difficulty:

1. Give them as much information as needed with respect to the deal.

2. Make it ridiculously easy to contact you – repeat your contact information redundantly if you have to. Always put up a physical address and phone number. And reply to queires promptly and without exceptions.

3. Have a no-questions-asked refund policy.

4. Display testimonials from your past buyers detailing their satisfactory experiences buying from you.

5. Create a community and let your members speak to each other.

The fact is that, if you are new in the daily deal industry, the odds are stacked against you. You will need to build up a community of members and buyers from the ground up and start building relationships with local merchants so as to get sustainable deal flow. Then there is the issue of trust, especially when you are new and relatively unknown and have no reputation whatsoever. Ultimately, the best strategy to build trust is to ensure that consumers can get independent, credible, and positive third-party opinions on you and your brand. That in itself can be a potent strategy not just for building trust but also for marketing and PR as well, so why not kill two birds with one stone?

Last week, I have suggested that contests and giveaways may be one of the most effective ways to build leads and drive signups for new daily deal websites. While it is becoming an increasingly common tactic, running your own contest or giveaway can still help you collect email addresses, Facebook fans, and Twitter followers, if you can sufficiently differentiate your marketing campaign to make it engaging and inherently viral (we will talk more about virality). Today we should be focusing on sweepstakes/lucky draw contests, because they are relatively cheap to run and easy to manage; plus, they are also the most eye-catching form of contest and most easily understandable at first glance.

The keys to running a successful sweepstakes/lucky draw contest are 1) a prize people would otherwise purchase with money if not presented with an opportunity to win it for free and 2) rules and parameters that are in line with your business objective – to drive signups and enhance brand awareness. Without further ado, let us get down to the best practices:

1. Big prize(s) with smaller chances to win trumps small prize(s) with bigger chances to win
If I offered you two opportunities: a 5% chance to win $10 or a 50% chance to win $1, which would you choose? Most people would likely go for the former (do not just take my word for it – Wikipedia says so too), because the initial investments for both cases are equal (no risk) yet the potential returns are much bigger in the former; the risk-reward ratio is much lower in the former. Big prizes are always more eye-catching anyway – in a contest, the magnitude of the prize is the focal point, the odds of winning are often treated as some form of fine print, thus big prizes encourage both sharing and participation. If you are unconvinced with the big-prizes-small-odds approach, you can certainly try the hybrid approach.

2. Have a built-in viral loop for your contest
To run a successful sweepstakes/lucky draw contest requires mass participation, and mass participation is only possible if participants themselves are incentivized to share your contest with others, be it directly or indirectly. All online contests and related marketing gimmicks require some form of viral marketing to keep awareness high after the initial marketing push by the contest purveyor. One popular method that we have come across in the network of daily deal websites that we host is to tie draw events to a minimum number of participants or Facebook Likes: e.g. “10 iPhone 4Ss to be given out. There will be 1 draw for each 100 participants (or 100 fans on our Facebook Page) achieved before the deadline. Limited to the first 1,000 participants only!” Participants have the incentive to share contest to increase the chances of a next draw event, driving signups and participation.

3. Facebook Likes as a method of participation
A related tactic that you can use with tactic 2. above is to say that winners for your big prize will be drawn from the pool of last 1,000 people who have Liked your Facebook Page (a chronological order of people who Liked your Facebook Page is visible from your administrative dashboard of your Facebook Page). This parameter will ensure that sharing is compulsory and that sharing and participation go hand-in-hand. An added bonus is that some people may be perceptive enough to Like and Unlike your Page frequently in order to always end up as one of the latest fans, ensuring that a post about your Facebook Page stays fresh and high up on those people’s friends’ News Feeds.

4. Conduct draws at regular intervals
Instead of saying that a draw will be conducted at random once a certain number of participants or Facebook Likes is reached, say that a draw will be conducted for the exact 100th, 200th, 500th, or 1,000th participant or Facebook fan. Crafting the rule this way may not encourage participants to join in when they are far from the draw interval, but it will definitely drive people to share your contest and your brand so that they have a chance at using other participants to get closer to the draw interval, at which point they themselves would opportunistically put in an entry. However, when hundreds or thousands of people think this way, interesting things happen.

5. “Last participant at closing time wins the grand prize”
This parameter should only apply to sweepstakes/lucky draw contests where multiple participations are allowed. Of course, you would need to craft the rules in such a way that their last entry can only count if it is separated from their second last entry by, say, 5 entries not belonging to them – otherwise, their last entry will be bypassed in favor of the second last entry that fulfills the rule. This rule will not only increase participation but also somewhat force sharing.

As with all marketing tactics out there, your mileage may vary. You should be able to craft contests for your intended or existing audience to match their expected behaviors in terms of the prizes that they care about, their level of adventure, their Facebook savvy, their Twitter savvy, etc. Of course, never forget that you need to give an initial marketing push to get the word out on your newly-made contests; nobody can participate unless people know about it. Give these tactics a try today!

P.S. If you want to start a daily deal website and conduct a sweepstakes/lucky draw contest right away to build leads, you can sign up for a free, no-credit-card-required, 15-day free trial account at our daily deal platform: http://www.zuupy.com. Have a good weekend!