Groupon’s extraordinary growth as a daily deal website is truly enviable for any actual or potential competitor. In fact, it would be seriously tempting to copy any externally-observable tactic employed by Groupon to try to replicate just a fraction of its phenomenal success. Interestingly, one may even say that our daily deal platform, Zuupy CrowdDeals, exists solely to service hundreds of individuals and small businesses whose raison d’etre is to clone Groupon itself.

The truth is that Groupon can get away with a lot of things because of its deep pockets and humungous (read: 9-figure) subscriber list. It can afford to experiment and implement a number of different things, including having a gigantic sales force to hard-sell merchants, having less-than-attractive/tired website designs, producing over-enthusiastic copy, and actively running deals across a ridiculous number of cities. Groupon is like the Amazon of the daily deal industry – it might not necessarily be wise to copy their every move given how different their circumstances are.

Just as you would not run a minimart the way Walmart or Tesco runs their hypermart, you should not run your fledgling daily deal website the way the market leader runs it. You can certainly draw inspiration, but it has to be backed by sound justification – and the only sound justification is really your subscribers/customers saying that they want whatever you intend to copy. Copying blindly without any indication or evidence that the demand for whatever you are copying exists is a waste of time, money, and resources. Find out what your subscribers want by talking to them. When you are small, you probably cannot do things autonomously and get away with it (a la the way Facebook frequently changes its layout and breaches its privacy policy); you need to bend over to some extent to the miniscule number of people who miraculously even care about your daily deal website.

The truth is that all Groupon did was validate the business model (and even then, how validated the business model is remains to be seen given the infancy of the industry). Copying the business model itself may be prudent – after all, if it has demonstrated a clear path to profit, it would be not prudent not to copy it – but copying its design, branding, marketing, and even deal inventory may not be effective, because you have a different set of subscribers with different demographics who have different wants and needs. You probably do not control the eventual make-up of your subscriber list (assuming they are opt-in subscribers, which they better be), as much as your positioning hopes to achieve a certain demographic composition. Design, branding, and copywriting follow who your subscribers and customers are, not vice-versa.

If you are going to copy Groupon with no additional innovation whatsoever, you will not succeed, not even marginally – because Groupon will always be a better Groupon than you can hope to be. You need to be better in some aspects, be they pricing, customer service, value-added content, or niche targeting, in order for consumers to even consider patronizing your daily deal website. Would you rather buy from Groupon or BestSuperSavingsDailyDeals? I know that Groupon will be the safe choice, and, unless BestSuperSavingsDailyDeals can offer something Groupon does not have, I would be better off sticking to Groupon. So would millions of others.